Is going to another movie in the movie theatre considered stealing if you paid for the first one? - movie theatre interview
Suppose you pay for a movie, and if the film is finished, stay in the cinema and go to the movies, not all (free of charge overcrowded).
OK, is obviously wrong, but the question is, it is considered theft. Morally wrong, yes. Robo:?
And there may in certain circumstances
To say that the theater is no longer selling tickets for the film, which lasts for half an hour after it began.
They say there are only like 2 people in the theater and the chance is that there is no way that the theater is filled.
Movie Theatre Interview Is Going To Another Movie In The Movie Theatre Considered Stealing If You Paid For The First One?
12 comments:
Yes, it is a form of cheating.
The question, and I am very interesting, I opened a section in my forum in the main hall.
Join now and they continue to discuss.
http://www.where2chat.com
is a form of theft
I can imagine that not only influence the outcome of the film and the owner of the theater.
You pay for a movie. With a view to robbery. My local theater that the ban if caught.
No matter how you justify it. If you rent "office" paid for a movie, you do not need for the rental of office-pay for a new movie.
Help yourself to 2 movies at a price of 1 is theft. We would not expect to be allowed to fly over the country, you immediately go back to the same place, just because you pay once, right? Same case.
Yes, steal. The fact that the second film can be vacuum irrelavent and robbed the owner to sell the house they were stolen. There is also a criminal offense. There is no gray area.
Yes, steal. You only have to pay for a movie, but saw 2nd There is no excuse for it. Sorry :-(
Oh, do not worry. Boys Will Be Boys. Have fun. Hollywood is a millionaire, even with the paste.
Yes, that is stealing a service of
Yes, that is stealing a service of
It is a form of theft. The movie ticket, you have paid only served to make the movie and not otherwise.
? fly No
Research? Yes, probably.
Post a Comment